3 ms·
On the flip side, the child didn't consent to being born, and indirectly any suffering a child endures can be traced back to a parent's decision to bring them i
by beisner 4y ago
On the flip side, the child didn't consent to being born, and indirectly any suffering a child endures can be traced back to a parent's decision to bring them into the world.
- foodslave 4y ago
- buscoquadnary 4y agoUnder that logic and reasoning any joy or happiness the child experiences can also be traced back to the parents decision to bring them into the world.
- rayiner 4y agoFocusing on the choice of the individual child is a very American way of looking at things. Nobody chooses to be born. So what? The obligation arises out of the relationship between parents, as a category, and children, as a category. Individual choice doesn’t carry nearly as much weight in Asian culture as it does in American culture. Likewise, the notion that obligations can only arise from voluntary and consenting exchange—as if it’s an economic transaction—is one that doesn’t make much sense in Asian culture.
- beisner 4y agoSure; my point is that both perspectives are equally arbitrary. Neither drive me nuts.
- rayiner 4y agoI didn’t say it wasn’t arbitrary—culture often is. My point is that as someone steeped in the asian way of thinking about it, the cultural conflict with the American mode of thinking is really significant.