So your arguing that they are illegally marking this despite FDA rules and regulations? Yea, thought not. So we agree that they are following the rules. So thi

So your arguing that they are illegally marking this despite FDA rules and regulations? Yea, thought not. So we agree that they are following the rules. So this whole “you are supposed to do …” doesn’t really constitute an argument. Also both arguing that the drug is overpriced because it’s just a combination of two other available drugs that you could just buy separately and take together, and then also arguing that they should have conducted a separate tox and efficacy study on the exact formulation they are using is crazy. And you state it yourself in your argument, you are allowed to make changes to the formulation, and not suprimo no Ku they where allowed. And they are not illegally marketing this, so what on earth is your argument?