3 ms·
But Italy has had barely any growth for 30 years. Negative in the past 10.
by mseebach 15y ago
But Italy has had barely any growth for 30 years. Negative in the past 10.
- fauigerzigerk 15y agoYes, real GDP growth has been anemic, but as most of the interest they pay is not inflation adjusted, you need to use nominal GDP - I think. Anyway, I think Italy does have a great industrial base, so they have something to work with if they can get some reforms done. Not so in Greece. But maybe I'm just whistling in the dark here. If interest rates spike and the ECB stops buying debt all talk of longer term sustainability will be moot.
- justincormack 15y agoThese numbers are not long term sustainable I dont think, a financial bubble and loose credit meant that banks could fund governments in increasing their debts in boom and recession, but now they have seen that the downside of that is bailing out the banks, and ever increasing leverage. The amount of government debt the non bank private sector wants to hold now is maybe half the existing stock. Higher real interest rates might increase that level somewhat by encouraging saving, as might mandated savings. The alternatives are inflation or default, or trying to float a giant government hedge fund to take on the leverage, the EFSF plan.
- fauigerzigerk 15y agoYou could well be right. But I'm still somewhat hopeful because the EU and the eurozone as a whole is less indebted than the US or Japan. So the problem becomes one of sharing the burden, which is the rational thing to do considering the disastrous consequences of an Italian default. I don't think the the EFSF will play much of a role in that. Ultimately the ECB will have to keep Italy's (and later Frances) bond yields at a sustainable level. They will have to do what the Fed and the Bank of England have been busy doing all along: monetize the debt. Trouble is, they're not legally permitted to do that, but I think the Germans are pragmatic enough to let it happen. The question is when.