4 ms·
We see many GitBook users migrating to Docusaurus and being satisfied with Docusaurus features, flexibility, UX/UI and performance https://twitter.com/__morse/
by slorber 4y ago
We see many GitBook users migrating to Docusaurus and being satisfied with Docusaurus features, flexibility, UX/UI and performance
https://twitter.com/__morse/status/1532430153338474534 https://twitter.com/__morse/status/1532430153338474534
https://twitter.com/Whelton/status/1540306373497724928 https://twitter.com/Whelton/status/1540306373497724928
https://twitter.com/mweststrate/status/1181276252293853186 https://twitter.com/mweststrate/status/1181276252293853186
https://twitter.com/jstrry/status/1461342355068309512 https://twitter.com/jstrry/status/1461342355068309512
I don't know GitBook well but GitBook is probably less flexible, but their main advantage is likely that they are less developer centric than Docusaurus. They offer a managed service and content updates can be sent without commiting markdown files to a Git repository.
Docusaurus does not come up with anything to author Markdown files: you'd have to figure your authoring experience yourself, using a CMS (git-based or not), VSCode, GitHub UI, Obsidian, it's up to you...