3 ms·
> "Net-zero" includes the use of systems that capture carbon directly out of the air, either all mechanical or with plants part of the system. "Plants" are ver
by ElectricalUnion 4y ago
> "Net-zero" includes the use of systems that capture carbon directly out of the air, either all mechanical or with plants part of the system.
"Plants" are very inefficient at CO2 capture. Most of the CO2 captured in Earth (by anthropogenic action or just by natural causes) is by algae/bacteria action.
> If the goal is "stop burning fossil fuels" there is a large precedent of non-fossil power sources such as solar, wind, hydroelectic, nuclear, etc.
> All of those systems need somebody to spend money for a product they don't want to meet an externally imposed requirement. It's going to be very hard to put a system in place to move the money around because of the perception (and reality) that anything that concentrates money in one place is going to be a nexus of corruption.
If a conflict in Europe happening right now isn't a good enough incentive to make Europe immediately carbon-free, not much really is.
- Tuna-Fish 4y agoThe conflict is not going to make Europe carbon-free, it's going to reverse the trend on emissions and make Europe emit more carbon. Renewables alone cannot power the grid. You need something dispatchable for that, or the grid will fail the first time there is a night with low wind. All electricity storage in Europe is a rounding error, and will remain one for at least a decade, no matter what is done. The dispatchable power used to back up wind and solar in Europe is traditionally gas, of which much is Russian. The rapid need to decouple energy needs from Russia is causing European operators to spin coal plants back up, and even build new ones.