3 ms·
Here is one from 2015 [1] (I recall some older and more recent ones, but can't find them right now). IIRC they rely on a number of strategies (not necessarily a
by cycomanic 4y ago
Here is one from 2015 [1] (I recall some older and more recent ones, but can't find them right now). IIRC they rely on a number of strategies (not necessarily all in the same story) :
1. A much better interconnected frid
2. Overcapacity in both wind and solar, but particularly wind.
3. Operate e.g. heatpumps during times with lots of energy available to heat or cool coolant.
4. Adjust energy intensive industries to primarily work during times of oversupply.
[1] https://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2015/EE/C5EE01283J#!divAbstract https://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2015/EE/C5EE0...
- tomp 4y agoThanks! I’ve still to read the article (hopefully I can find the full text somewhere) but looks like instead of batteries they’re proposing heat-based energy storage (and radical energy use reduction). Edit: The study you linked to actually just summarises another study (in about as many words as I did above): Jacobson, M.Z., M.A. Delucchi, M.A. Cameron, and B.A. Frew, 2015. A low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes, Science, in review.
- pfdietz 4y agoAlso look at this web site, which I often reference, that enables you to construct cost-minimized 100% renewable systems to supply baseload power. Some places it's cheaper than in others. Sorry, Eastern Europe and the Baltic. https://model.energy/ https://model.energy/