2 ms·

The real theory page, Marxist cultural analysis, is mentioned by name in the first paragraph of the conspiracy but not linked. I don’t know how wide spread thi

The real theory page, Marxist cultural analysis, is mentioned by name in the first paragraph of the conspiracy but not linked. I don’t know how wide spread this is on Wikipedia but there are a few of these examples that are very concerning and if our court system is utilizing it as suggested that is a worry. Yet another issue that mass information has created that solutions haven’t yet come up with. >As a parallel, should https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_agenda https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_agenda actually link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_studies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_studies? This is not even close to a parallel scenario and borders on bad faith.

magicalist 4y ago
> The real theory page, Marxist cultural analysis, is mentioned by name in the first paragraph of the conspiracy but not linked. I only see > "Cultural Marxism" redirects here. For "cultural Marxism" in the context of social theory and cultural studies, see Marxist cultural analysis. and "Marxist cultural analysis" is definitely linked. >> As a parallel, should https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_agenda https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_agenda actually link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_studies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_studies? > This is not even close to a parallel scenario and borders on bad faith. Conflating a specific set of accusations of supposed degeneracy eating away at the base of western culture with a wider academic discipline that includes studying/discussing said "degeneracy" seems appropriate to me but maybe you can be more specific about why you think they aren't parallel?