Uhm, I’m only talking about reading papers that are published. No way would I condone a reviewer doing this to a paper they are reviewing lol. Also I emphasize

Uhm, I’m only talking about reading papers that are published. No way would I condone a reviewer doing this to a paper they are reviewing lol. Also I emphasized that this is more true in biology. When there’s no math or software, there’s often nothing to gain from the text of the results. The evidence is supposed to be in the figures.