2 ms·
> If we wanted [better upward mobility (out of homelessness)], we should've invested in low-income housing, and public transit infrastructure so that people cou
by xpe 4y ago
> If we wanted [better upward mobility (out of homelessness)], we should've invested in low-income housing, and public transit infrastructure so that people could live elsewhere, and commute. Also, healthcare for folks who struggle with mental health.
I want to focus on the "If we wanted that," part. The "we" part is notable and problematic. I'll mention two senses here:
* desire (measured by preference aggregation): what do "we" want, based on aggregating (somehow) individual preferences
* action (collective action): what can we agree to do?
My point is this: Just because _action_ hasn't happened does not mean that _desire_ is not there. There is big gap between the two. One recipe is:
1. define the group with the desire
2. find and organize them
3. identify the common preferences
4. accumulate political capital
5. wield the power
I'm not a naive optimist; this is hard. But don't assume the _desire_ is not there! It takes effort to align a previously scattered group of people into something with cohesion and identity.
- xracy 4y agooh, yeah, I mean, clearly people want the symptoms fixed. And I think a reasonable number of people want to live in a city with low-income housing, public transit, and mental healthcare for all who need it. I'd be surprised if anyone didn't want that. But I think the specific things when suggested, are things people oppose. "I want public transit, but I don't want them to put it on my street". Also, full agreement that I'm not able to comment that people don't actually want this, only that the elected officials (and other powerful people) don't appear to want this (in Seattle). That is definitely who I'm referring to.