4 ms·
Right at the bottom: "This article series is designed as an Oxford-style debate. As such, participants are required to argue pro and con positions, even when t
by omnicognate 4y ago
Right at the bottom:
"This article series is designed as an Oxford-style debate. As such, participants are required to argue pro and con positions, even when that opinion may differ from their own. The views expressed in this debate do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the participants, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, or the American Society for Nutrition."
- hammock 4y agoWould we be so generous to allow the same kind of debate on any science-related topic.
- yucky 4y agoOf course not, that could get dangerous!
- throw0101a 4y ago"The Earth is round: yes or no?" :)
- john-radio 4y agoWell, er, it was indeed debated before the question was settled. It was a whole thing actually.
- sha256sum 4y agoAnd the opposing view from the same issue: https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/112/4/926/5901948 https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/112/4/926/5901948
- klenwell 4y agoI feel like this thread's title is editorialized (and click-bait). It got me. To be fair, maybe it hit a character limit. The actual title: Children and adults should avoid consuming animal products to reduce risk for chronic disease: NO You mean switching to a diet of twinkies won't reduce my risk of chronic disease?
- boredemployee 4y agoIt has not a click-bait intent. It hit the character limit.