3 ms·
I think it's less the problem of "shareholders" and more "short term shareholders." If you're holding for 10 or 20 years, you may well be considering things li
by hakfoo 4y ago
I think it's less the problem of "shareholders" and more "short term shareholders."
If you're holding for 10 or 20 years, you may well be considering things like "If we spend a dollar in R&D today, we get back twenty later", but the guy who's bailing after the next earnings report wants that dollar on today's books. We do a questionable job serving tha long-term investor.
On a long enough term, most of the social-ethical-envrironmental investment strategies that are seen as niche can also be seen as prudent-- are you sacrificing the value of investors in 2050 by keeping a cavalier attitude on climate change today, or paying your contractors so poorly that they'll be unable to buy your future products?
We have the short/long term capital gains tax divide, but there's no reason we couldn't tax short term gains at a much higher rate than conventional income, explicitly to force people to demand long-term corporate perspective.