I think your “not a debate” issue might also be not -real-. According to this: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Demographic-characteristics-comparison-of-cl

I think your “not a debate” issue might also be not -real-. According to this: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Demographic-characteristics-comparison-of-clients-and-sex-workers_tbl1_260716594 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Demographic-characterist... The median age of sex workers clients is 42yrs old, and the standard deviation is 10 years. If I’m doing my basic stats right that means that 99% of clients are under the age of 65, and 99.9% are under the age of 73. Which means that the 19yr old and about 1000 other clients are subsidizing the over 73yr old clients. Idk what the going rate is but if it’s $200 that’s $0.20 each if the over 71yr old paid $0. I don’t think you’re getting ripped off, my guy. Edit: fixed an early rounding error. 99.9% is under 73 not 71.