4 ms·
that "freedom of movement" was exclusively for people in cars, and came at the expense of the freedom of movement of everyone else (not to mention safety). bes
by _dain_ 4y ago
that "freedom of movement" was exclusively for people in cars, and came at the expense of the freedom of movement of everyone else (not to mention safety).
besides, it's not like you can't still drive in the netherlands.
- codefreeordie 4y ago
- _dain_ 4y agowhat are you basing this on? the netherlands has a system of high speed motorways, along with rapid inter-city rail and a dense network of cycle routes. cars, trains, bikes, buses, are all viable ways of getting around, both within cities and between them. why do you think the only worthwhile part of the transport network is the road network? and why do you think the only worthwhile road users are motorists? it seems like you think nobody should have any choice except to travel by motor car. lack of choice doesn't seem like freedom to me.
- BB5E7E990A84 4y ago
- codefreeordie 4y ago
- _dain_ 4y ago