3 ms·
> We absolutely should invest to make public transport faster, and thereby attract more riders. People don't use public transport because it is faster, but bec
by peoplefromibiza 4y ago
> We absolutely should invest to make public transport faster, and thereby attract more riders.
People don't use public transport because it is faster, but because it is consistent, it is cheaper than many other options and it reduces the stress of commuting. Being a passenger is much more relaxing than being the driver. Not having to find a parking spot is liberating for your mind. Not getting fines is good for your finances.
Public transport doesn't attract more people because almost everywhere is at peak.
NY subway, for example, moves 5.5 million people a day (the peak capacity is slightly above 6) but it is harder to make new lines or increase the number of rides, while with cars you just ride yours to the highway and stay stuck there in traffic for as long as needed. You can't stack trains like that or the delay of a single ride will cascade to the entire rail line possibly for many hours.
People who prefer cars IMO are either outside of the public transport coverage, bad at planning or anxious.
- mjevans 4y agoIt still has to be fast enough. It also needs to evolve beyond just the hub and spoke model that expects everyone to commute to the big city from the suburbs.
- Ekaros 4y agoThere is need for lot more circular routes. Connecting the spokes to each other.
- peoplefromibiza 4y ago> It still has to be fast enough Fast enough is relative. I'm European and don't know the USA situation very well, but IMO consistency beats speed every time. The route between the city of Monza and Milan in Lombardy takes 10 minutes by train and 40 by car (not including parking) People take the car because that train line is not reliable and trains are often canceled last minute. In theory the train is much faster, in practice it's a Russian roulette.