3 ms·
Hm. He keeps [redacting] Nancy's name, but leaves it in all the screenshots. Sloppy work, there.
by bdonlan 15y ago
Hm. He keeps [redacting] Nancy's name, but leaves it in all the screenshots. Sloppy work, there.
- skeletonjelly 15y agoCame here to post the same comment. So strange - is this on purpose or I wonder if he just did a find/replace?
- pessimizer 15y agoHis goal seems to be to keep the page from coming up on google searches on "Steve"'s families' names.
- corin_ 15y agoUPDATE (1/12/2011): I received an email from Steve regarding this post. He sincerely apologized for his actions and realized now that what he did was wrong and simply asked that I modify the post to protect the identities of his family. I felt that this was a fair request, considering that his family had nothing to do with what Steve did and it doesn’t jeopardize the impact of the article. So, if you’re wondering why you’re seeing all the “[withheld]“‘s, that’s why! PS – Yes, I realize the names are still shown in the images, but they’re not indexed by Google
- burgerbrain 15y ago"but they’re not indexed by Google" ...yet.