3 ms·
These are important points you're raising that change the course of the conversation significantly, so please also add citations so that folks can see them, oth
by basilgohar 4y ago
These are important points you're raising that change the course of the conversation significantly, so please also add citations so that folks can see them, otherwise, the argument falls flat and gets dismissed.
- ncmncm 4y agoWikipedia is right there, if you care.
- BuckRogers 4y agoI went to research this for you and couldn’t find the sources. I’ve dismissed the original argument outright.
- ncmncm 4y agoI knew you would.
- delackner 4y agoLinks or your argument is just noise. Here is the closest I could find to what you are talking about, explicitly saying an appeals court ruled against a nuclear operator trying to get the refund you are talking about: https://flarecord.com/stories/511480139-appeals-court-rules-against-energy-company-seeking-refund-in-federal-nuclear-waste-tax-dispute https://flarecord.com/stories/511480139-appeals-court-rules-... """ NextEra is still not entitled to a refund because federal law requires the DoE, not NextEra, to actually dispose of the spent nuclear fuel. """