I think the cons run the reputation system. Its just gambling anyway. If it wasn't, there wouldn't be any risk. So how can you tell the difference between a "ge

I think the cons run the reputation system. Its just gambling anyway. If it wasn't, there wouldn't be any risk. So how can you tell the difference between a "genuine" reputation system, and one that has been gamed by con-men? I don't think the sample size will be big enough to distinguish between cons and legitimate failures.