3 ms·
> blocking sites, because they don't like what they say, and because they show a different side to western propaganda... that's a bad precedent to set. You mea
by wiseowise 4y ago
> blocking sites, because they don't like what they say, and because they show a different side to western propaganda... that's a bad precedent to set.
You mean blocking sites because they spread blatant misinformation, fake news and generally text book demagogue?
- ajsnigrutin 4y agoSo basically, every mainstream news media in the last few decades? Or is it just when it's the "other guys" doing it? When it's "iraq has weapons of mass destruction", "iraqi soldiers kill babies", "trump inpatient, feeds fish to fast", "smirking kid attacks native american", etc?