4 ms·
> You let it be published and broadcast, like a normal free country would. You're being irrational. Free countries don't broadcast the enemy's information duri
by xdennis 4y ago
> You let it be published and broadcast, like a normal free country would.
You're being irrational. Free countries don't broadcast the enemy's information during a war.
- vogre 4y agoAre the free countries in war with Russia? Is US in war with Russia? Is EU in war in Russia? If so, should we already send nukes?
- solar-ice 4y ago> Are the free countries in war with Russia? > Is US in war with Russia? Is EU in war in Russia? Yes. > If so, should we already send nukes? No.
- wiseowise 4y agoThe word you’re looking for is “conventional war”. We’re in information war at the current stage.
- trasz 4y agoOf course we are at war - Russian nazis invaded, and so we are defending. But you can’t send nukes, because 1. Nukes are bit more complicated than vodka or coal, and given that nowadays Russia can’t even make a car, nukes need regular servicing, and the rest of its armed forces are a joke, it’s highly unlikely their nukes are any better. 2. Sending nukes would turn Russia into wasteland; rest of the world would do better because of its natural advantage.