>It's not that nuclear fission is inherently unsafe, it's just that every reactor needs to be playing it's A game every day. The second half of your sentence i

>It's not that nuclear fission is inherently unsafe, it's just that every reactor needs to be playing it's A game every day. The second half of your sentence is literally arguing that fission is inherently unsafe. Which is it? You have two choices: 1. Fission is inherently unsafe: then why do the numbers contradict you? 2. Fission is not inherently unsafe: then what's the problem?