The point from the article that I'm really concerned with is: > It is well to keep this biological fact in mind when considering outlandish claims about the im

The point from the article that I'm really concerned with is: > It is well to keep this biological fact in mind when considering outlandish claims about the imminent victory of veganism. And while 'victory' is loosely defined, appears to come from the idea that: > much of the world is trending towards plant-based eating My point is exactly that if the "work around" (as you put it) works then the argument that biological history will necessarily prevent veganism from becoming more popular no longer really holds, precisely because we can "work around" it. I don't really take issue with the idea that biology has to one degree or another helped to shape dietary habits today, just that the historical trend may not hold in the future in the face of social (which I take to include scientific) change.