These articles always go for the ‘world ending scenario’ and use false information like “limited resources” to perpetuate that. But if you take a step back and

These articles always go for the ‘world ending scenario’ and use false information like “limited resources” to perpetuate that. But if you take a step back and instead focus on how fragile the economy is, you instead can reach the same conclusions without the lie in the sky. Imagine if some nefarious nation/ group / person decides they are going to blow up all the chip fabs? Pretty hard considering there are a few hundred of them, but even a select few could send the world into a huge recession for a few years. Imagine if someone destroyed a group of grid transformers? It would take at least 6 months to get that regions power back on. What if some American president utilized the military to its true power? This would destroy most of the world’s manufacturing capabilities. These scenarios are much more likely than ‘financial collapse’ but will definitely lead to it.