I appreciate your specifics, but the nature of the article here is not about the very detailed facts about an 'unearthing' but rather, how the information is be

I appreciate your specifics, but the nature of the article here is not about the very detailed facts about an 'unearthing' but rather, how the information is being presented in the press. Broadly, the story is 'kids killed in aboriginal genocide, bodies discovered all over the place' - which is not the case at all, it's much more complicated than that, and though there are surely newly discovered bodies here and there, most are not, and nobody was killed on purpose in some kind of genocidal act. It's about 'popular narratives' vs. 'nuanced reality' - not so much 'a small detail vs. another small detail'.