>For two messengers operating on two different encryption protocols the only way to talk to each other is to introduce an intermediary. Or they simply could ag

>For two messengers operating on two different encryption protocols the only way to talk to each other is to introduce an intermediary. Or they simply could agree on solid common exchange protocol. There's no requirement to support crappy encryption. Just to open communication with your service. We've dozens of functionality identical, incompatible proprietary protocols, because each corporate schmuck wants their own walled garden, to squeeze a few more cents. Why should we agree to that?