This disclosure sounds super shady itself. Among their reasons they list that it's a "huge challenge" to manually vet traffic to detect malicious usage. They'v

This disclosure sounds super shady itself. Among their reasons they list that it's a "huge challenge" to manually vet traffic to detect malicious usage. They've been online for two years and only now determined that this would be a challenge? And then blame a hacker of manipulating user balances and data loss. Please. This sounds like incompetence on their side to keep their shady business under wraps, and now that it's been made public, they're shutting down to re-brand and launch a "new" service with the same backend. Any one of their "competitors" could actually just be them.