> Again, they’re literally paid to respond to those crimes. Eh, this part is dubious. They have no duty to protect, and no duty to respond to a crime. > What

> Again, they’re literally paid to respond to those crimes. Eh, this part is dubious. They have no duty to protect, and no duty to respond to a crime. > What is the point of police if they’re ignoring reports? Lots of people asking this question lately. It's a good one.