Disagree. You need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture. What's right from a human's point of view may not necessarily be right from nature's po

Disagree. You need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture. What's right from a human's point of view may not necessarily be right from nature's point of view. > A tiger simply don't think whether the way it lives and kills prey is ethical. Even thinking about whether a tigers' behavior is ethical is missing the point. Tigers do what they do. Accept it. It's not "wrong". > Animals don't have intimacy. They just do their stuff wherever they are. Depends on the animal. Elephants tend to live in close-knit families. You should go observe a bird (such as a crow) feeding its young one. Such a lovely sight. > it's not the behavior I want for myself. I wouldn't promote it, because it goes against the direction I would be happy to see other humans moving You've been conditioned to think that that's a better way to live. It may not be. Here's what we "civilized" humans have collectively done: 1. Wrecked nature and have already caused much damage. 2. Kill animals for sport/entertainment ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (Tigers hunt for survival!) 3. Colonized and plundered places and were brutal to the natives of those places. 4. Wars. 5. Even if not a colonialist — some humans have killed other humans, and many others have hatched plans to make others' lives miserable. You see this across the world. Wearing a tuxedo doesn't mean they're good for the world. Think about it this way — the world would be a better place (combined, for the entire life on Earth) if there were no humans at all. Naturists are the least of the world's problems.