> I think it’s great that you think it is “trusted”, but I prefer the “trust but verify” approach. I don't trust "Trusted computing" at all. It is, by it's own

> I think it’s great that you think it is “trusted”, but I prefer the “trust but verify” approach. I don't trust "Trusted computing" at all. It is, by it's own definition, rotten to the core. > The core idea of trusted computing is to give _hardware manufacturers_ control over what software does and does not run on a system by refusing to run unsigned software. "hardware manufacturers" in this case meaning, of course, Intel, not whoever is using their product to build actually productive things.