2 ms·
Do you understand how the example you just gave is exactly the opposite of the actual scenario I tried to paint. My ENTIRE point is that it's a continuum. It's
by culi 4y ago
Do you understand how the example you just gave is exactly the opposite of the actual scenario I tried to paint.
My ENTIRE point is that it's a continuum. It's not a binary thing. The point is that there's gonna be an impact and it's gonna be somewhere between 2.35 and 6.25 of impact on some arbitrary scale I just made up. Why would we act as if it's 0 when we could at LEAST act as if it's 2.35??
Your scenario is exactly the opposite of this and a really unhelpful metaphor
- Manuel_D 4y agoWhere does the lower bound of 2.35 come from? When you state this lower bound you are saying that we know with certainty that at least this much impact will happen. We lack that data so there's no lower bound, or rather the lower bound is zero. You could falsely claim a lower bound, but that erodes the credibility of the environmental movement.