5 ms·
But the first two are correct? Is that what you're saying?
by YourFriend87 4y ago
But the first two are correct? Is that what you're saying?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- idiotsecant 4y ago
- YourFriend87 4y ago
- happytoexplain 4y agoIt's hard to believe that, given he only said one was wrong, you think he might have meant the others were wrong as well. You should try to rephrase your question to get at your eventual point, rather than try to lead people.
- YourFriend87 4y ago
- ZeroGravitas 4y agoYou can menstruate with one ovary, and get pregnant with none, so at the very least the other two are sloppily worded. That's if you count them as three separate claims, to my count they're all combined into one statement, which means the whole thing is logically false if any part is false, which is the case here.
- YourFriend87 4y ago
- ZeroGravitas 4y agoBy your simplistic definitions, yes there are. But real life is very complicated and so people who actually care about this because it directly affects them aren't so quick to draw absolute lines: https://interactadvocates.org/faq/ https://interactadvocates.org/faq/ > Nature doesn’t decide where the category of “male” ends and the category of “intersex” begins, or where the category of “intersex” ends and the category of “female” begins. Humans decide.
- YourFriend87 4y ago
- ZeroGravitas 4y agoMost humans have never met someone with red hair. Intersex people are about the same size group as a percentage but possibly more evenly distributed and harder to spot from a distance. But yeah, 1 in 100 people, that's nothing, I don't care about or even believe in the existence of any group smaller than about 800 million myself, left-handed people only just make the cut at 1 in 10 but everyone else with made up genetic conditions like epilepsy, albinism, red hair or autism, or the mythical people with less than 2 arms and legs, just stop thinking you are special and be normal, that's what I say.