4 ms·
Quick look at sources from Wikipedia confirms that the articles’ basic assumptions have a rather loose association with facts. And the site itself is known for
by trasz 4y ago
Quick look at sources from Wikipedia confirms that the articles’ basic assumptions have a rather loose association with facts. And the site itself is known for propagating hoaxes and promoting alt-right (Noah Carl).
- AinderS 4y ago> the articles’ basic assumptions have a rather loose association with facts Could you be more specific?
- trasz 4y agoYes - look at the table summarizing discoveries of bodies, then follow to the sources. Contrary to the article above, those are not “alleged” or “unproven”.
- AinderS 4y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamloops_Indian_Residential_School https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamloops_Indian_Residential_Sc... contains no tables, and under the heading "Possible unmarked graves", it says "As of January 2022, no remains had been excavated, leaving the initial claim unverified."
- trasz 4y agoCan’t believe I forgot the link, sorry: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Indian_residential_school_gravesites https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Indian_residential_..., “Investigation of unmarked gravesites“, “Confirmed human remains”.
- commandlinefan 4y ago> Wikipedia ... propagating hoaxes Wikipedia itself is awfully untrustworthy, though - look what they're doing with the "recession" page today.