4 ms·
I have an alternative, possibly controversial opinion that I'm still working through. I think talking about "Fake News" or "The Attention Economy" or "The Alg
by jvanderbot 4y ago
I have an alternative, possibly controversial opinion that I'm still working through.
I think talking about "Fake News" or "The Attention Economy" or "The Algorithms" robs us of our fundamental agency, pins blame on "others who are radicalized by technology" and "those who manipulate them", and prevents us from natural, easy steps to becoming more civil.
The stories we tell ourselves matter, fundamentally, as any psychologist, stoic, mindfulness master, or person suffering from mental health issues can tell you. Whenever we, as individuals, let something dominate our mind, then we'll be more prone to seeking information about those negative stories, confirmations, communities built around them, etc. In this case, Fake News is just responding to market pressure that we're unable to stop creating.
Cognitive behavioral therapy was purpose built to help individuals remove cyclic, persistent, negative narratives from their minds, mostly through positive reframing. It's efficacy as part of a three-hit combo is pretty good. CBT, Mindfulness, and, if required, medication.
The controversial bit is that I think we've allowed anti-social narratives to take hold, do not question the uselessness / lack of benefit of its hold over us, and have compounded this by telling ourselves there's nothing we can do about it because "Fake News" or "Attention Economy" or "Wokeness" etc etc.
I think every single person can purge these anti-social narratives in themselves, starting with the part where we believe others are to blame, and others are irredeemably corrupted by what's on TV or where they were born, or how much money they have, etc etc.
- mayormcmatt 4y agoAs I like to play games, oftentimes I frame things in RPG terms, so the way I think about self-agency is that we all have that as a stat -- some have it higher or lower depending on many factors. Things like algorithm-fed infinite scroll dopamine hit feeds (FB, Tiktok, Reddit, etc.) apply a debuff to many people's ability to exercise self-control/discipline. Some people have a high enough self-control stat -- or they have some learned technique or tools (new skills gained from experience/leveling up, if you will) -- that they can roll to resist, while others fail and are seduced by the spell of the feeds. These things do seem specially designed to short circuit our self-control, after all. I think it takes foresight, good education, good parenting, good luck, and probably more, to set someone up to resist these products and messages. Some folks just aren't or weren't prepared for them. Sorry if this is a silly response to your post. It's just my two cents.
- bavell 4y agoLove the analogy. I feel like my self-agency stat is pretty high compared to my peers and I attribute that to my aversion of some of the biggest debuffs - social media (only HN for me), partisan clickbait, us-vs-them mentality, etc. We all have many built-in heuristics for analyzing the world and some of them easy to hijack if you aren't paying enough attention. The In/Out group dynamic is a big one that is regularly taken advantage of.