I find it tragic how common this rhetoric exists, where one says we should take something seriously immediately after downplaying the issue with a crippling "[n

I find it tragic how common this rhetoric exists, where one says we should take something seriously immediately after downplaying the issue with a crippling "[no] convincing evidence" clause. Managing world-ending risk, the bar for conviction simply oughn't be so high. How convinced of the inevitability of a home invasion must one be to lock their doors & get an alarm or a gun?