3 ms·
fwiw, here is how I loosely think about the problem: Humans are both 100% animal and 100% human. There is no dichotomy. A human acting "as an animal" is doin
by fellowniusmonk 4y ago
fwiw, here is how I loosely think about the problem:
Humans are both 100% animal and 100% human.
There is no dichotomy.
A human acting "as an animal" is doing a maximally human thing.
A human acting as a "civilized" person is also maximally human.
Choosing not to play the game via "suicide" and choosing to stay in the game to see where it leads via "not suiciding" are both maximally human decisions.
The most fucked up but also a maximally human expression is to try to enforce your chosen / memetically inculcated views of "acting human" on other humans. Forcing others whom you have never met into your is/ought for "reasons".
It's fucked up because the coda one chooses to enforce shaves the weirdness of humanity off (being bullied for liking computers in the 80s slowed the rate of human computer adoption) in an attempt to socially decrease the range of acceptable expressions thus narrowing the global tree of human exploration and expression.
- rmbyrro 4y agoHi, I hope the way I expressed my views didn't cause any personal resentments. To be clear, I'm not enforcing anything. Just expressing, which is quite different. I think both of us can agree that expressing points of view through words is a human thing. It's also a human thing to do that even with strangers. That being said, I will certainly review my views in the future and hope to improve them. I expressed what is my current view on those topics. You can obviously disagree, discard them, or anything else your judgement indicates.