3 ms·
> It lasted less than three years and will leave players with nothing to show. Well they got to play the games? Not sure what you'd want to show? Like high-sco
by chrisseaton 4y ago
> It lasted less than three years and will leave players with nothing to show.
Well they got to play the games? Not sure what you'd want to show? Like high-scores?
- greenthrow 4y agoAre you serious? They bought the game, now they don't have the game. They didn't rent it. Google still exists, and has plenty of money to make all Stadia customers whole by buying them a retail copy of all of the games. But they choose not to because they are greedy. Note: I am not a Stadia customer because I figured this would happen.
- chrisseaton 4y ago> They didn't rent it. It's a service isn't it? You play it online. You got to play it. Not sure what makes you think I can't be serious about that? If I want to play a game I don't care if I 'buy' it or rent it - I care about the playing. They asked what they got from it - they got to play the game. Wasn't that the point?
- mehlmao 4y agoBecause Google is taking away their ability to play the game they paid for. Stadia sells copies of games ($60 a pop), and offers subscriptions for additional money for higher video quality and access to a smaller library of games. The people who purchased titles from Google are having those titles taken away from them.
- dyingkneepad 4y agoI still play my copies of Diablo 2 and Diablo 2: Lord of Destruction that I bought on launch day, in checks wikipedia 2000 and 2001 respectively. On Single Player, with Plugy. I think they were worth the price I paid for them.