An analogy can only serve to clarify a concept. If I'm already aware of a concept, then the analogy is deceptive. It serves no logical purpose other then to dec

An analogy can only serve to clarify a concept. If I'm already aware of a concept, then the analogy is deceptive. It serves no logical purpose other then to deceive. It literally serves no other purpose. For some reason when humans hear an analogy there is a slight catharsis when the brain puts two puzzle pieces together and relates the analogy to the original concept. This catharsis serves to delude the brain into thinking the analogy serves as supporting evidence when it is in fact nothing. Can you prove that the business cycle is inevitable? Why would an analogy prove anything? I also literally said that there have been methods used to stop the business cycle. And yes these methods have been successful at completely impeding it... but at great cost. It's called communism. So literally I've proved the statement wrong by showing the existence of a counter example. The proof hints at the possibility that there are other systems besides capitalism or communism that are undiscovered or not created yet that could impede the business cycle without the associated cost. Others could say that communism as defined by the manifesto was never really implemented or that the current examples of communism failed for different reasons OTHER then communism. Either way, the cycle being inevitable is categorically false.