4 ms·
If all this effort is expended only to look at a single object, the whole idea seems kind of pointless. However, we are using the mental model of a camera lens
by ur-whale 4y ago
If all this effort is expended only to look at a single object, the whole idea seems kind of pointless.
However, we are using the mental model of a camera lens to reach that conclusion, and I'm not certain it applies:
1) even if we use the mental model of a camera lens, given the distances involved, you can probably consider most of the interesting the targets to be "at infinity"
2) I'm not certain that a gravitational lens works like a camera lens.
- samus 4y agoIt behaves differently of course, and the pictures would be massively distorted. But with some image processing it should be possible to do some analysis. One of the recent JWST images shows an example where a massive galaxy cluster makes redshifted galaxies behind visible.