3 ms·
You're only preemptively hurting "attackers", but you've redefined "attackers" to mean "anyone you want to preemptively hurt". I expect in the vast majority of
by jstanley 4y ago
You're only preemptively hurting "attackers", but you've redefined "attackers" to mean "anyone you want to preemptively hurt".
I expect in the vast majority of cases, if someone breaks into your home while you're inside, it's because they didn't know you were inside.
- lelanthran 4y ago> You're only preemptively hurting "attackers", but you've redefined "attackers" to mean "anyone you want to preemptively hurt". No, I did not. How are you defining "someone who uses force to get to me"? My definition of an attacker specifically requires that they force their way to me and my children. You are on some insane mission to trivialise the danger from someone who is prepared to force their way to you. Why? (I'm generally curious, btw - why is your expectation that someone who forces their way into a house is peaceful by nature?)