3 ms·
Some comments: "A major problem that I have with the new interface is that Gmail has gone from text-based buttons to an icon-only design." The text is there,
by cjfont 15y ago
Some comments:
"A major problem that I have with the new interface is that Gmail has gone from text-based buttons to an icon-only design."
The text is there, it's simply been converted into tooltips. Are you really going to need to have the text there after using the button a few dozen times?
"The bad is that the compact is hard to read, and comfortable displays less information than the classic Gmail design."
Perhaps it's because I'm using a custom theme and so my view is different, but I don't really see much different between "compact" and the old design.
"Google has also removed the bottom toolbar from the interface. So if you're at the bottom of your inbox, you have to move the mouse back up to the top of the screen to archive, spam, mark messages read, and so forth."
Seriously? Are you going to suffer from RSI from moving your mouse up the screen each time you view your inbox? Not sure why your cursor keeps ending up at the bottom of the screen each time you finish checking your inbox.
The only points I can really agree with the author on is that the new interface is slower to use than before, and also on the excessive use of whitespace -- there does seem to be a lot of unused area with the new look (although it does make my theme look prettier).
- StuffMaster 15y ago>The text is there, it's simply been converted into tooltips. Are you really going to need to have the text there after using the button a few dozen times? Multiply this attitude by a hundred apps/websites and YES I WANT TEXT. I don't use the toolbars of half my apps because I don't know what the buttons do, and I shouldn't have to work to find out.
- cjfont 15y agoThere's a balance between using additional screen real estate for more info and the user having to take an extra step to get that additional info, such as hovering over a button. For some people, such as myself, there is more work involved for the eyes that have to scan over that extra content everyday as compared to hovering over an unknown button once in a blue moon.
- robotresearcher 15y agobut the icon buttons are bigger than the text they replaced!
- StuffMaster 15y agoAnd even if they're not, I have to do mental work: icon -> wtf does this picture mean -> english translation. I find that far more tedious than standard word scanning.
- schwit 15y agoThe best icon is a word. There's no interpretation necessary between picture and purpose. This new version looks like something from Microsoft ... change for the sake of change.
- CamperBob 15y agoExactly. If icons are the answer, why don't we use hieroglyphics everywhere?
- dredmorbius 15y agoOne of the few rationales I can think of for icons is that it makes internationalization a slightly easier task. The losses for that win aren't particularly compelling for me though, and I dislike the icons myself.