>If your claim is that the police should always show up armed and expecting to be shot at in the United States What part of my comment is that (or anything els

>If your claim is that the police should always show up armed and expecting to be shot at in the United States What part of my comment is that (or anything else you've said) responding to? I asked a simple question: what is the appropriate "probability of a shooter" that justifies going in with a protocol that expects one? Now you're just guessing things that have little to do with what I said.