3 ms·
I've found that, using keyboard shortcuts (and with a decent Internet connection), Gmail becomes about as efficient as Pine/Alpine (I've never used mutt). I do
by 2arrs2ells 15y ago
I've found that, using keyboard shortcuts (and with a decent Internet connection), Gmail becomes about as efficient as Pine/Alpine (I've never used mutt).
I don't love the redesign (I think the placement/appearance of the "important" and "starred" markers is terrible), but since they didn't change keyboard shortcuts at all, I can still plow through reading/replying/labeling messages.
- dasil003 15y agoYeah, my biggest complaint originally was the lack of density, since being about to see the maximum number of emails has long been a killer feature of Gmail, but they fixed that with the compact view. The contrast issues are there, but it really doesn't bother me because I'm in Gmail hours every day. All I need is consistency, responsiveness and comprehensive keyboard shortcuts.