3 ms·
This is the least charitable perspective you could adopt. If you looked at the prompts, it's clear that this system is to help initiate a healthy conversation w
by dereg 4y ago
This is the least charitable perspective you could adopt. If you looked at the prompts, it's clear that this system is to help initiate a healthy conversation with your parents/trusted entities about how to deal with and understand these types of photos.
1:1 conversation couldn't be more different from NSFW internet searches. A malicious party can use coercive tactics to have the child send them compromising photos.
- HidyBush 4y agoI am tired of being charitable to these companies. Children shouldn't drive cars, they shouldn't do drugs and they shouldn't use smartphones. Would you be fine with a beer company making a "safe" version of beer for kids so they get hooked and once they turn 21 they switch to the real stuff and become alcoholics? Making these devices more "child friendly" is the wrong solution to the problem. Actually, it's the absolute BEST solution if you are Apple and want to calm the parents down and sell more phones and services at the same time. Unfortunately I'm not Apple and my objective regarding my kids is not to maximize profits and push complex technology to people down to the last semi-conscious toddler
- dereg 4y agoThere's no censorship/prohibition of content going on, unless you consider opt-ins censorship. I do not. I'm curious about how you feel about Google Image's SafeSearch being turned on by default. Is it also worthy of such ire?
- lostlogin 4y agoIs there anyone alive that had their first drink at 21?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jakeva 4y agoI did, and lots of former mormons who leave their religion and embrace the vices of the world after their two year mission.