3 ms·
Why not just mount the code in the container instead of copying it over? Rust deals very cleanly with build artefacts from different architectures so there's no
by tinco 4y ago
Why not just mount the code in the container instead of copying it over? Rust deals very cleanly with build artefacts from different architectures so there's no risk of corruption.
- fnord123 4y agoThis is a good idea but there is tension between this straightforward approach and the fact that, on macos, docker is running in a VM so it's inherently slower.
- arein3 4y agoIsn't docker trying to use virtualization from the OS to run linux on "bare metal"? If so it should acheive similar speeds to native linux
- tinco 4y agoThe virtualized storage layer could actually be a bottleneck here. Though I think they've improved the performance of it to the point where it might no longer be a bottleneck but I'm not sure.