> But not every appeal to logic comes from malicious philosophers. Most do not. Whether it comes from a malicious philosopher or somebody who means well but is

> But not every appeal to logic comes from malicious philosophers. Most do not. Whether it comes from a malicious philosopher or somebody who means well but is confused, it is generally prudent to consider whether the discussion is actually worth your time. I haven't met many philosophers actually pitching Zeno's paradoxes at people, but some I've encountered recently for real: reasons why Jesus is the means to salvation, why the Earth is flat, and why we're probably living in a simulation. I brush these aside without giving them serious responses, because I selfishly want to spend my time in other ways.