4 ms·
The other side to that is that MS appeared to "stuff" ISO committees in various places to force it through, and didn't provide enough detail in their huge spec
by Nursie 4y ago
The other side to that is that MS appeared to "stuff" ISO committees in various places to force it through, and didn't provide enough detail in their huge spec for true interop.
Perhaps neither was perfect, but it certainly seemed like MS played dirty.
- oaiey 4y agoWell, they were/are the dominant player who could not adopt another standard and had zero incentive except regulatory and public opinion. It is a proprietary standard full of History. Nothing else than horrible in standard and process is to be expected.