3 ms·
That’s what I didn’t understand. If you want this accessible over a network, you wouldn’t want to use a direct thunderbolt connection. As mentioned below, you c
by mbreese 4y ago
That’s what I didn’t understand. If you want this accessible over a network, you wouldn’t want to use a direct thunderbolt connection. As mentioned below, you could try 25Gbps Ethernet, but you’d also need to upgrade the clients. I assume the clients are currently 10GigE (copper?). As it is, you’re pretty much saturating the network bandwidth. Really, he could have also saturated the bandwidth with spinning HDDs too, given enough of them.
- jeffbee 4y agoThe network sounded pretty small in this case, so 2x thunderbolt ports would have done the job. Anyway the means of attachment would be ip-over-thunderbolt, which is a thing that is supported by both Mac OS and Linux, so it can all be bridged to a traditional ethernet if needed for other clients.