5 ms·
Mac OS X market share cracks 8%
- omouse 18y agoAre they counting the iPhone, iPod touch or iPod etc operating systems as part of OS X?
- siculars 18y agowell with the five or so apple laptops and desktops i have in my house alone i wonder what took them so long. but really, i would like to thank microsoft for vista ;) disclaimer, not including two iphones and various generations of ipods :)
- biohacker42 18y agoDoes anyone care to guess what the critical level is? Presumably at some point OS X stops being a niche market, and producing cross platform software becomes almost mandatory. I'd guess 30%.
- comatose_kid 18y ago'In the last two years, Mac OS X's share has increased by 3 percentage points, a gain of 58%.' That's about 25 percent CAGR, so there are still a few years to go before we hit that point, assuming of course that the growth rate is sustainable.
- LogicHoleFlaw 18y agoIt's exactly the point at which the loss of revenue due to incompatibility is greater than the cost of developing cross-platform.
- akd 18y agoThanks for exactly restating his question. I needed that.
- bdr 18y agoHey, it made things clearer. For example, when you break it down like that, you might realize that the cost vs. benefit analysis is different for different kinds of software -- there is no "critical level" in general. This is good news for Apple. As their market share grows, software crosses that threshold continuously (as opposed to all at once). That makes their platform become continuously more appealing to users too, creating a positive feedback loop.
- jrockway 18y agoproducing cross platform software becomes almost mandatory How does this explain all the Mac-only software?
- cstejerean 18y agoProducing cross platform software becomes mandatory for companies that make Windows software currently (unless they don't mind their market shrinking). For Mac only software the market is growing so if they're happy enough at the moment there be even less incentive for them to develop cross platform.
- opal 18y agoToo bad it's a fake *nix. Not compatible out of the box with 95% of linux applications.
- lallysingh 18y agodarwinports does a pretty good job. And for many things, the mac has better software available. Besides "fake *nix" could apply as well to linux as to darwin. Remember that OS X actually licensed the Unix name...
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- opal 18y agoNo. You can compile the vast majority of unix projects on linux and run them with no modifications. Darwinports is ok if you want only the top 1% of popular projects, often several versions behind.
- jrockway 18y agoToo bad Why? OS X doesn't stop anyone from running Linux.
- eelco 18y agoUh. In other news, no wait, in the same news (the site the article is based on, link at the bottom), Linux' market share almost _doubled_ in 9 months. How's that for growth ;)
- Prrometheus 18y agoI was intrigued by that, too. However, iPhone share is growing quicker and it's going to be slightly embarrassing when the iPhone passes Linux in market share.
- tlrobinson 18y agoI'd like to see market share stats broken down by segments of the market, i.e. business, servers, consumers, etc. I suspect OS X's consumer market share is much higher.