3 ms·
Is that because they're using Alpine and Musl? I am reminded of a discussion a few months back. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30642632 https://news.yco
by rascul 4y ago
Is that because they're using Alpine and Musl?
I am reminded of a discussion a few months back.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30642632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30642632
- InvaderFizz 4y agoProbably. Thankfully RFC9210[0] now makes the musl implementation clearly in violation of spec, so their reasoning for just truncating replies is no longer relevant. 0: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9210 https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9210