3 ms·

I mean their actual new core product that they are apparently betting the company on is absolute dogshit as well to be fair. Take a look at this and the replies

• smoldesu 4y ago
  That doesn't look... awful? For realtime graphics on a 120hz screen, that's not any worse than Memojis and leagues better than whatever Samsung's ill-fated AR garbage was. I get a kick out of watching companies take the piss for bad art direction, but I really struggle to imagine a better solution here. Would people prefer photo-scanned faces mapped onto a low-res mesh? Methinks it would be even further into the uncanny valley...
  • mhoad 4y ago
    You are kidding me right? Nobody looks at that and feels like that’s even remotely in the ballpark of something anyone is ever going to be excited to use.
    • 2OEH8eoCRo0 4y ago
      I hate Facebook. I'm excited for more VR/Metaverse.
    • tmp_anon_22 4y ago
      It would be different if they just wanted VR to be a success. But to replace Facebook's once-in-a-economy golden goose money ultra-printer with it? Thats so much to ask as to be comical.
    • smoldesu 4y ago
      How would you design it differently?
    • ehnto 4y ago
      In fairness to them, VRChat is/was the dominant VR social avenue and it doesn't exactly have cutting edge visuals. But there is something quite bland about that meta video. Like you have all this creative freedom and you choose a desk and some bobble heads.