3 ms·
> The fact that Exxon (edit: oops I mean shell) has a higher ESG score than Tesla should be all you need to know. If you weren't so deeply into Musk intimate p
by Bubble_Pop_22 4y ago
> The fact that Exxon (edit: oops I mean shell) has a higher ESG score than Tesla should be all you need to know.
If you weren't so deeply into Musk intimate parts and repeat word for word his tweet you'd realize that it makes perfect sense.
Exxon only extracts the thing, it doesn't burn it. Tesla burns a lot of energy to build cars.
That's not to say ESG is a perfect system, perfection would be assigning an ESG score at the atomic level, meaning for every single human. At that point it wouldn't matter if you are the CEO of an oil company or the CEO of a coal car company which sells itself as a solar car company...when you board the G650ER you'd get the automatic Z-rating which puts you at the very bottom enabling peers to shame and attack you.
Of course it will never happen because the elites love to protect their CO2 intensive lifestyle while pontificating the rest of us to drive electric and eat bugs.
- losteric 4y ago> Exxon only extracts the thing, it doesn't burn it. Tesla burns a lot of energy to build cars. ESG supposed to provide a holistic measure of impact. Exxon and Tesla's ESG score would include the impact of using their product (ie burning Exxon's gas, driving and eventually disposing Tesla's cars)
- Bubble_Pop_22 4y agoDoesn't change the core concept of my post. The enemy of the environment is not Exxon or Tesla or Shell. The enemy of the environment are the CEO of Exxon, Shell and Tesla. Just one individual like that emits more CO2 than a small town during their whole lifetime of traveling in private jets and yachts to their big mansions all over the globe